The weak world leaders who want to dictate Israeli policy

They’re not generals, they’ve never conducted a war, they know nothing about the inner workings of the Middle East or the vast differences between tribal terrorists and. a pluralistic democracy but, nonetheless, feel qualified to dictate Israeli policy.

Who are these unequipped, inexperienced and presumptuous individuals that think they know better than seasoned military minds, whose entire lives have been devoted to the study and strategies of war, fighting savage terrorists in real time, all-too familiar with the mentality and mindset of the Arab world?

They are the weak world leaders who, mostly for political reasons, are anxious to end a war which they deem has been going on for too long, regardless of whether the initial threat has been quelled.  

For them, the driving force is the loud cries of their ever-growing Muslim populations, accompanied by Woke partners, who are willing participants, in the anti-Israel jihad. Draped in full Palestinian regalia, they wear their newfound identities, taking on the persona of Hamas sympathizers whom they don’t consider villains.

As those voices of resistance grow louder and louder, world leaders cower in weakness, thinking that they can assuage the spreading hatred which has taken hold of their streets and public squares. 

It’s the reason that Australia’s Anthony Albanese, France’s Emmanuel Macron, the U.K.’s Keir Starmer, Canada’s Mark Carney, along with a number of others, have announced their intentions to formally recognize a Palestinian state next month, knowing that to do so is a blatant attempt at dictating Israeli policy.

To them, it doesn’t matter that the two-state solution has died a violent death, murdered execution style, by the same savage terrorists whose objective was to kill as many Israelis as possible. Starting with the easier and more convenient southern kibbutz communities, their plan was to move into neighboring cities such as Be’er Sheva and then on to the ultimate challenge of Tel Aviv.

Why would anyone come to another conclusion, other than the obvious deduction that the end game is one state for one people? Because if the goal is to kill all the Jewish citizens, then the naïve notion of peaceful coexistence is not an option, except in the minds of wishful thinkers.

But these weak leaders are anything but wishful thinkers. Unless they are completely ignorant of the violent and deadly ideology, espoused by every Jew-hating terrorist, they well-know that if they want to retain their power, they must sacrifice to the gods who grant them that privilege – at least for now. That is why they foolishly view their best chances of kingdom-preservation by selling out the fiercest warriors who are invested in slaying the fire-breathing dragon.

It is a self-deluding proposition, contributing to their own vulnerability and dependency upon a constituency to which they must kowtow. The trade-off is subservience to their terror-supporting benefactors, without whom these weak leaders would fade off into the sunset. 

But the price to pay is heavy, because these leaders are no longer able to operate from a place of personal conviction. So even if they know that it’s best to allow Israel to complete its mission, they will choose to insinuate a course of action, designed to hurt the only democracy in the Middle East.  In the end, it won’t go well for their countries either.

On this subject, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has weighed in, categorically stating, “It’s not our place to dictate to Israel what to do.” Consequently, he does not advise Prime Minister Netanyahu on how to proceed.

That reasoning comes from an astute understanding that he doesn’t possess all the facts. What he does know is that the word of Hamas is worthless. It’s not new to hear that what seemed to be a done deal, dramatically changes at the last moment. Agreed upon conditions are modified, causing all hope to crumble for lack of being able to meet impossible demands.

Huckabee instinctively knows that Israel must act in a manner which best serves its interests, taking into account the lives of the hostages, as well as the overall security of the other 10 million citizens and residents who comprise the Jewish state.

Unlike the weak world leaders, whose irrational strategy is to pressure Israel to wrap up an unfinished war, Huckabee is wise enough to recognize that a safe homeland for the Jewish people cannot be one that shares a border with those committed to its annihilation. Comparing the Hamas to the Nazis, he knows that monsters like these, are incapable of living alongside sane people who value peace and freedom. 

That means that they must not remain – not here and hopefully not anywhere.  Because their survival, whether on Israel’s border, on Europe’s frontiers or Down Under, will only result in the killing of anyone who refuses to be under their complete rule. That would include millions who are unwilling to become the dhimmis (those under the protection) of Islam. 

It is sad to say, but anyone doing the bidding for prematurely ending a bloody war, in the hope of scaring Israel to avoid the dreaded two-state solution, is already subject to dhimmi status. Because, in essence, they are furthering the cause of a worldwide Islamic takeover by trying to prevent the demise of these enemies of humanity.

The ill-fated concept of appeasement and compromise has never displayed the indomitable strength which is the only language tribal factions respect in the rough and tumble territory of the Middle East. 

And don’t think for one minute that Hamas, and other terrorists, don’t sense the extreme weakness being shown by these cowardly leaders who are fearful of how they would be able to contain such an outbreak of violence towards their own citizens, if their migrant populations were to unravel and explode. Quick to tell Israel how to deal with the likes of those who perpetrated a dark-ages massacre on us, these weak leaders would end up in a fetal position, trembling as they desperately search for any possible way to return sanity to their land.

Yes, it’s easy for these weak leaders to threaten Israel, as they haughtily demand our obedience, but their day may not be far off. Faced with the same brutal enemy, will they then realize that remaining silent and allowing us to finish the job would have been the best course of action?

Or will it already be too late for them?